Micah Richards admits he was amazed by the spectacle that was Rangers vs Celtic on Sunday.
However, the former Premier League winner insists he was left SCREAMING at Hoops winger Yang for his part in Rangers' third goal.
The youngster allowed Rabbi Matondo to cut inside on his right foot from the left wing deep into stoppage time.
The Wales international then unleashed a wicked curling effort beyond Joe Hart, leaving the Celtic keeper no chance.
And Richards, who was a right back himself back in the day for Manchester City, says he knew the shot was in after the attacker was allowed to come inside.
"A ferocious game," he told The Rest Is Football Podcast. "Absolutely ferocious. When Matondo got the ball, I was screaming. I'm screaming at the defender to just show him wide.
"I'm coming back from London, watching it on Sky Go and I'm thinking: 'Oh, game's done here,' then 'what are you doing? You're showing him the wrong way!'
"When he hit it, I just knew it was going in the back of the net. It was an incredible finish, it really was. He just bent it. Similar to Kevin de Bruyne's goal, it was just a wonderful strike.
"Curled it right into the top corner in the last minute of the game. It was a great game."
READ MORE: 'Noise me up' - Radio pundit's Rangers vs Celtic penalty view irks Chris Sutton
Meanwhile, John Beaton was correct to award Rangers a penalty after initially booking Fabio Silva for simulation inside Celtic's box.
That's the viewpoint of former Wales midfielder Robbie Savage.
Hoops hero Christ Sutton accused his fellow BBC pundit of 'noising him up' as they appeared on their Sunday night radio show together.
They discussed the day's action-packed football, including the 3-3 derby encounter between Rangers and Celtic at Ibrox.
There was controversy as John Beaton decided to overturn his decision on Silva after an on-field VAR review. James Tavernier then stepped up from the spot to get Philippe Clement's side back into the game at 2-1.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel