It’s not an acronym or, more correctly, an initialisation that trips off the tongue, but everyone involved in Scottish rugby should remember SROI.
The study about Social Return On Investment (SROI) at rugby’s grassroots level which was published last week by the Scottish Rugby Union was conclusive in its findings. There is absolutely no doubt that rugby in Scotland contributes greatly in terms of health, social and economic benefits at the grassroots levels.
The overall figure for SROI was put at just under £160m annually, and this excluded the professional level entirely. In my interpretation that means £160m would be necessary to spend if the people who accrue these benefits – such as club volunteers – did not give their time and effort free of charge.
READ MORE: Celtic officially tease new home kit after string of recent leaks
Personally I consider the benefits of rugby to be incalculable, but I realise that some sort of monetary figure had to be worked out and given the methodology used by the firm Substance who compiled the report, I could not disagree with their findings.
Forgive me for being slightly skeptical about some matters in the report - I have had much longer to read it that those rugby writers who had to respond instantly, and so I can express some doubts though I emphasise that I both welcome the report and agree with most of its findings.
For instance the figure of registered players was put at 50,000, but how can that be the case when clubs are reporting difficulties in getting teams out each week of the season?
The exact number of ‘volunteers’ was put at 8,159 and personally I thought it would be more, especially when you consider the growth of women’s rugby in recent years. The contributions made by volunteer administrators and coaches was estimated to be worth £30.95m, but again that level of support really can’t be calculated for the good that people do in volunteering.
Substance had to report that of the 169 member clubs in the SRU, just 101 or 60%, actually responded to the club survey. That’s frankly a disgraceful return. We all know that there are member clubs out there who are virtually moribund, but this survey should have been responded to by all clubs with a committee – and that’s most of them.
My only major disagreement with the findings was the calculation that rugby injuries COST the healthcare system – presumably NHS Scotland – just £519,270. I’m sorry but that is unbelievably low, especially when you consider that more players than ever before are being given scans for head injuries.
READ MORE: Robert Snodgrass 'devastated' following Open Goal jeers at OVO Hydro
That’s a quibble, however, and the overall thrust of the report is remarkably positive and very good news for people like me who have argued for years that more investment must be put into grassroots rugby. A return of almost £8 for every £1 invested is in line with other sports and better then some, so every time a Government official or local authority questions why they should be investing in rugby, they should just be handed the Substance report.
Above all I echo the words of Gav Scott, Scottish Rugby’s Director of Rugby Development, as quoted by big David Barnes on launch day: “It’s about people who put into the game for nothing and the value that has for society in Scotland. As people involved in rugby, it’s things we probably already know – we know there are benefits to both health and wellbeing from a playing perspective but also from a volunteering perspective – [but now] we’ve put some numbers to it in an effort to show people there are strong benefits to our sport.”
Credit to you, Gav, and all those at the grassroots level who do so much for our sport.
And while we’re at that level, congratulations to Community Club of the Season, Dalkeith RFC, and all those who won awards at the Scottish Rugby Community Awards the other night, and please don’t mind if I single out Bernie Mitchell, winner of the Spirit of Rugby award which recognised his 45 years of service to Hillhead Sports Club. Thanks to Bernie and all the winners.
READ MORE: Bravery and bum notes - how this season has thrown us through a loop
At the elite level, the season is approaching its end for our two professional clubs. Glasgow Warriors are in with an outside chance of finishing top of the United Rugby Championship table but at least they are already in the quarter-finals.
To continue into the semis, a bonus-point victory over Zebre at Scotstoun on Friday evening is a must, however, while Edinburgh Rugby must also gain the same result against the URC’s other Italian club, Benetton, at 1pm on Saturday, or else their season really will be all but over with participation in the quarter-finals then dependent on results elsewhere.
I cannot finish without thanking Toulouse and Leinster for that magnificent Champions Cup final at the weekend, and of course there was our own Blair Kinghorn proving that his move to France was the right thing to do. As for the brilliance of Antoine Dupont? Did I hear Austin Healy say he is the best person he has ever seen play? Might be the first time I’ve ever agreed with the fellow.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel