STEVE Clarke has attributed Scotland’s vastly improved performance against Switzerland in their second Euro 2024 match in Cologne last night to his players embracing football's dark arts as he started preparations for the encounter with Hungary on Sunday.
Clarke and his charges were under intense pressure going into their Group A encounter with Murat’s Yakin’s men in the RheinEnergieStadion because of their abject display in the 5-1 defeat they suffered at the hands of Germany in Munich last Friday night.
However, Andy Robertson and his team mates were far better in defence, in midfield and in attack and secured the point they needed to keep their hopes of reaching the last 16 alive at the end of 90 engrossing minutes.
Clarke was pleased that Scotland, who beat Cyprus, Spain, Norway and Georgia in qualifying and secured their spot in the finals with two games to spare, managed to put their opening loss firmly behind them and give a good account of themselves.
The former Newcastle United, Chelsea and Liverpool assistant felt that showing their nasty side had enabled his players to get a 1-1 draw against opponents who reached the Euro 2020 quarter-finals and give the Tartan Army a display and a result to cheer.
READ MORE: Kieran Tierney 'gas and air' injury update amid 'freak' injury run
“We knew what we had to do, the players knew what they had to do,” he said. “So it was a good team performance against a good opponent. I said before game I wanted the players to show the real Scotland I think they did that. It was a good reaction to a disappointing night against Germany. And we are still alive in the tournament.
“Sometimes as a footballer or a manager it doesn’t go your way, and it certainly didn’t go our way last Friday night. But this was just a case of getting back to what we’re good at by working hard and making sure we got the preparation right, and I thought we did.
“The reality is when the draw was made and we were drawn against the home nation in the opening game, you’re looking at the secondary games in the group and thinking: ‘Maybe that’s where the points are going to come from’. And that’s the way it’s turned out.
“Everybody was trying to overhype the fact that we had to get something from the Switzerland game. But the reality was, even if we had played well against Germany, we’d probably have been in a similar position where we had to go into the Switzerland game and get something to take the group to the last game. That’s what we’ve done.
“They’re going to feel a lot better going into the next game on the back of that kind of performance, which is what we are. This is how we play, this is how we work. We’ve shown, as well as the aggression and the fight, the dirty side of the game if you like, we can play.
“When we got the ball down and we played we created some chances. Switzerland created some chances too and I’d imagine for the people watching it was a pretty good game. For me, it was pretty nervous at times, but I was also pretty hopeful at times.
“So, we did what we had to do and we’re still in the competition and that was the most important thing. It was what we expected. This is the way we have been playing as a team for the last three or four years. It’s why we’re here at a major tournament.”
READ MORE: Why Scotland's Switzerland showing was proof of Euro 2024 right
Clarke dropped Ryan Christie against Switzerland, moved Scott McTominay into a more advanced position just off striker Che Adams and brought in Billy Gilmour in central midfield alongside Callum McGregor and was pleased with the difference his changes made.
“I thought Billy was really good,” he said. “He is a really good player. He is a fantastic player. Everyone uses that word technical, but sometimes what gets missed is that he is a good player.
“It was always my intention to start Billy in the second game and that is why he did not start the first game. But I knew. You could see itowards the end he was tiring a little. It is a tough shift in midfield. But I thought that he and Callum McGregor, both central midfielders, were outstanding.
Scotland supporters, former players and media pundits had all called for Angus Gunn to be dropped after the Norwich City man let in five against Germany – but Clarke ignored the critics.
He was pleased that Gunn, who produced three vital saves during the course of the 90 minutes, justified his selection.
Asked about the 28-year-old’s inspired showing, he said: “I am glad you asked that question. That is what you need your goalkeeper for, that is what we need from Angus.
“When we are the team coming into this kind of match you need your goalkeeper to make good saves and that is what he did. Two or three really good saves though he got a goal kick from one of them, That is what you need at key times. , you need your goalkeeper to save a goal and that is what he did.”
READ MORE: Where Scotland stand amongst Euro 2024 third teams
Gunn was only beaten when Xherdan Shaqiri pounced on an underhit Tony Ralston pass and curled an unstoppable first time shot into the top corner in the first-half.
The second choice Celtic full-back is only playing at Euro 2024 because Aaron Hickey of Brentford and Nathan Patterson of Everton are injured – but Clarke felt that he was not solely to blame for the equaliser.
“Tony made the mistake and it was a small mistake,” he said. “It could have been recovered because there were two players near the ball. If that chance falls to any other player in the Swiss team it’s not a goal. He (Shaqiri) is a top, top player. You do not give top players that type of chance.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel