Ronald de Boer has revealed he snubbed a move to Manchester United to join Rangers.
The Dutch hero had the opportunity to move to Old Trafford from Barcelona in 2000 but instead chose a transfer to Ibrox.
De Boer has explained his decision came down to advice from Louis van Gaal who insisted the midfielder would be better served by joining Rangers.
The Ibrox hero had spoken with Sir Alex Ferguson over a Manchester United deal and was informed he would be utilised at Old Trafford, but Van Gaal advised De Boer against the move.
Another factor was the security offered by Rangers with a four-year deal and a better shot at remaining in the national team by more regular football.
Read more:
-
Todd Cantwell in cryptic Rangers update amid transfer exit noise
-
Rangers sign Hamza Igamane as boss says striker has 'a lot of talent'
He told FourFourTwo: "I remember being in the Barcelona kit room, speaking to Alex Ferguson on the phone. He told me he was keen to sign me for United, and explained how he'd use me in midfield.
"But around the same time, Dick Advocaat approached me on behalf of Rangers. I remember being in the Dutch camp, talking about my future with Van Gaal, who had since become the head coach of the national team.
"I asked him what he thought. He said that at Rangers I'd always play, which would be better for me as a 30-year-old, and for my role in the Dutch team as well.
"I chose Rangers, also because of my knee, which wasn't perfect. I wasn't injured, but I thought I might not get through the United medical.
"At Rangers, I was able to sign for four years, which gave me some certainty. If Van Gaal had advised me to join United, however, I would have done that. I really valued his opinion."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel