PRINCE William has been heavily criticised for snubbing Canada’s historic run to the Copa America semi-finals while celebrating England’s success at the Euros.
Canada triumphed over Venezuela in a penalty shootout to reach the semi-finals of the competition for the first time before losing to Argentina.
It was Canada’s deepest run at a major tournament outside the CONCACAF Gold Cup – a less competitive North American tournament – which shook the nation who are ranked 48th in the world.
But Canadian political commentator Fred DeLorey has slated the nation’s future King for not congratulating the team on their incredible success while publicly revelling in England’s run to the final of Euro 2024.
READ MORE: New SNP MP Seamus Logan takes dig at monarchy as he's sworn in
Though William was not at England’s semi-final win over the Netherlands on Wednesday, he was pictured cheering the team on as they won their penalty shootout over Switzerland in the previous round and he attended the 1-1 draw against Denmark in the group stage.
In a blog post, DeLorey tore into the heir to the throne’s apparent ignorance which he said left him considering whether it was time for Canada to “step up and fully mature” and cut ties with the monarchy.
DeLorey wrote: “It was great to see his [Prince William’s] enthusiastic response to England beating a Swiss team and making it to the next round. I harbour no animosity towards the English.
“But witnessing the heir to the Canadian throne exulting solely over England's win while completely ignoring Canada's historic achievement stung.
(Image: PA)
“As a monarchist, I appreciate the role of the monarchy in our democracy. However, it’s crucial that our monarch reflects the evolving identity and achievements of all Canadians. The monarch reigns over us because we allow it to, not simply because it can.
“It was disheartening. Canada is a mature country that has come into its own.
READ MORE: Anti-monarchy groups to protest 'pantomime' King's Speech
“Yet, despite our accomplishments, we are often seen as either the loveless child of the English monarch or the kid brother of the USA. This perception undermines our sovereignty and the respect we deserve on the world stage.
“Maybe it is finally time for Canada to step up and fully mature. To assert our place in the world with confidence and pride, free from the shadow of external monarchs and influences.”
In the ice hockey-loving nation, Canada’s football team – or soccer team as they would say - going on to face the world champions with a chance at reaching the Copa America final was a pivotal cultural and sporting moment for the country.
It is the third most prestigious football tournament in the world.
DeLorey reflected on searching social media after Canada reached the semi-finals for any sign of support from the Prince, but he found nothing expect him jumping up and down for Gareth Southgate’s side.
READ MORE: Labour MP Clive Lewis protests swearing-in with republic call
The former national campaign manager for the Conservative Party of Canada spoke of how his sons both play football and he had to flit back and forth between the respective playoffs they were involved in the day after Canada’s victory in the quarters.
He added his loyalty to both his children’s teams made him consider whether William “can genuinely claim the same level of dedication and love for all his subjects”.
“Prince William's clear favoritism towards England over Canada is reminiscent of a parent favoring one child over another,” DeLorey added.
“He cheered for England and completely ignored Canada, a country that deserves more respect from our future King.
“Just as I ensured both of my kids felt equally supported and celebrated, our monarch failed to do the same.
“Prince William's oversight felt like a snub to our nation's pride and accomplishments. If the monarchy is to remain relevant in Canada, it must celebrate our victories and share in our moments of glory.”
Kensington Palace has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel