Valur manager Arnar Gretarsson has admitted St Mirren should have scored twice in the first-half in Reykjavik.
The Icelandic boss, 52, was relieved to see his side make half-time with the scoreline level but insists Valur could have been ahead themselves but for Ellery Balcombe between the posts.
The St Mirren goalkeeper - on loan from Brentford - sprung into action to deny Valur on a handful of occasions with top-notch stops to ensure the tie remains level heading back to Paisley next week.
Reflecting on the stalemate, Gretarsson said: "It was what I expected. I think maybe it was a fair result, I don't know. I think it is an open game for the second leg, I think we have a chance there.
"It is going to be more difficult definitely as they will have a full stadium.
"St Mirren had a lot of chances, especially in the first half. They should have scored two goals.
Read more:
"We made a couple of mistakes in the first half which we were lucky not to concede goals.
"When I say that, it was us making mistakes it's not that they were playing through us.
"When you have the opportunities you need to be clinical.
"The goalkeeper was very good. I thought we created enough to score one or two goals, I thought their goalkeeper made a few excellent saves."
Buddies boss Stephen Robinson also hailed his goalkeeper for his important saves in the big moments.
"We created a lot of chances," he said. "But Ellery made two super saves and he deserves a lot of credit.
"His distribution was very good too."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel