Norwich manager Johannes Hoff Thorup has admitted he wanted Adam Idah to stay at the Championship club instead of moving to Celtic.
The striker, 23, completed a permanent transfer move to Parkhead last night committing his future to the club signing a five-year deal.
It's reported an £8.5m fee was required - with sell-ons and bonuses - in order for Norwich to sell the player.
🗣️ JHT on Adam Idah: “I think it wasn’t perfect against Oxford, but he came in with an attitude to perform. He stepped up after the episode in Austria. I think we can be proud of the transfer, he has been here for a while. He wanted to go to Celtic, which is fair. I wish him all…
— The Pink Un (@pinkun) August 15, 2024
Idah had been linked with Celtic all summer after an impressive loan spell from January where he helped the club to a Scottish Premiership and Scottish Cup double.
The player returned to Norwich at the end of the season and linked up with his team-mates in pre-season with Thorup keen to run the rule over the forward before any decisions on his future.
Idah missed a flight to pre-season training in Austria with the club and faced internal disciplinary action over the AWOL incident, but he was involved in the club's Championship opener against Oxford.
Now, Thorup has tipped Idah to be a Premier League quality striker in the future as he revealed he wanted to keep the striker this summer.
Read more:
“I think it wasn’t perfect against Oxford, but he came in with an attitude to perform," said Thorup of Idah after his move to Celtic was finalised. "He stepped up after the episode in Austria. I think we can be proud of the transfer, he has been here for a while. He wanted to go to Celtic, which is fair. I wish him all the best.”
“When you are on a contract here you have to fulfil that contract. Unless there is an offer that’s acceptable. You cannot force your way out.
“I see him as a potential Premier League striker with his attributes and power. I wish him all the best and hope he can perform well at Celtic FC. I would have wanted him to stay."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here