Claims that Rangers are on the brink of a multi-million-pound takeover appear to be wide of the mark.
Thats according to The Rangers Review who spoke with former chairman Dave King about the prospect following reports on Tuesday that suggested a £150million valuation had been placed on Rangers by potential suitors that were keen to take a seat on the Ibrox board.
King’s stance is the story has “no truth whatsoever” and it’s understood key stakeholders have not been contacted about selling their shares.
Amid the latest developments at RIFC plc, King remains the primary shareholder, holding a significant 14.12 percent of the company’s shares.
Meanwhile, the current Ibrox chief, Bennett, oversees a 5.51 percent stake. Other key figures in the organization include Douglas Park, George Taylor, Stuart Gibson, and Julian Wolhardt, who are all influential players working behind the scenes.
“There is no truth whatsoever to the rumour that a USA billionaire - or anyone - has expressed any interest in acquiring Rangers,” King told the Rangers Review.
“The Club is going through a difficult phase that was largely self-inflicted and commenced with Douglas Park refusing to back Steven Gerrard’s ambition to kick on from title 55.
"Self-interest should never be put ahead of our Club. I am hoping that John Bennett turns things around. I know he will do everything in his power to do so.”
Read more:
- Vaclav Cerny believes the best is yet to come from him at Rangers
- Winner of next Celtic vs Rangers set to steal all-time bragging rights
A proposed acquisition by Kylie Fox and KRF Capital fell through last year, leading to Rangers securing a significant legal victory over the American entrepreneur.
Fox was aiming to acquire a 75% controlling interest at Ibrox, but a report from City AM on Tuesday indicated that she is not involved with the new group exploring bids for minority stakes.
Speculation about a potential boardroom shakeup at Ibrox arises as Bennett prepares to finalise the last transactions of the summer transfer window to enhance Philippe Clement’s team.
Rangers, who have already failed to reach the Champions League league phase, are still seeking new players before the deadline on Friday night.
In recent months, Bennett has been reviewing the finances and all operational sectors to reduce expenses following years of financial excess at Ibrox. At last year's AGM, the chairman emphasized the need to achieve £10.5 million in cost saving
“I very deliberately called out a number at the AGM and it is not an overstatement to say that becoming chairman my number one mission off the pitch was to rid the club of pre-player trading losses,” Bennett told RangersTV last month.
“And I called that out at the AGM. That number to June 2023 was £10.5m, that's unsustainable and we should talk about sustainability, Financial Fair Play etc. That right there is wholly unsustainable and I said that has to go away. You can't just will things to go away, it takes action.
“I look at that and that is well on the way to being eradicated and that has taken a lot of work from a lot of people and I have driven that, I have driven hard and it has been hard on some people, for example, to drive that through and execute it. But execute it we must. I'm not having club, which we'll come to player trading, and the famed player trading model we need to address that, but first get after what I call low-hanging fruit.
“This club should not be losing £10.5m pre-player trading in a year, my goodness me. When I became chairman - and again it is not an overstatement to say this required cultural change.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel