PRO-PALESTINE campaigners are calling for an Israel based cycling team to be banned from the Tour of Britain which is set to start in Scotland next week.
The Borders branch of the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (SPSC) and Scottish Sport for Palestine are urging organisers British Cycling to kick out Israel Premier-Tech (IPT) from the major event which sets off from Kelso on Tuesday, September 3.
The route will see cyclists tackling a variety of terrain from the Scottish Borders to Felixstowe in Suffolk over six days.
A pro-Palestine demonstration has been planned at each of the race locations across the UK, including in Kelso from 9am.
IPT was founded in 2014, with former four-time Tour de France winner Chris Froome its most famous member.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour MP took trip to Israel funded by Zionist group
The campaign groups want British Cycling to ban the team from any subsequent events too, as they have suggested IPT is using cycling “to sanitise and launder” Israel’s “well-documented crimes including apartheid and genocide”.
An email petition to British Cycling’s CEO Jon Dutton has reportedly been sent by hundreds of concerned locals in the Borders.
Israel Premier Tech owner and Israeli-Canadian philanthropist Sylvan Adams – who grew up in Montreal in a Zionist home - previously told the Jerusalem Post regarding the team’s participation in the Tour de France: “The best way to answer the haters is through our performance and presence.”
Campaigners are concerned Adams sees sport as a means of enhancing the country’s standing amid its trial at the International Court of Justice for the crime of genocide - a common diversion tactic known in the human rights community as sports-washing.
Scottish Borders SPSC Chair Elisa Smith said: “The ICJ has ruled that the situation in Gaza is a ‘plausible case for genocide’ and that Israel is operating a system of apartheid in Palestine.
“Israel Premier Tech's primary objective is that when you hear ‘Israel’ you don't think of IOF [Israel Occupation Forces] snipers paralysing athletes, 16,000 dead children in Gaza, or the raping of Palestinian detainees.
“Instead, they want you to focus on Chris Froome (above) making a record-breaking time or Tel Aviv's rooftop bars, as evidenced by Israel's Tourism Board team jerseys and their social media feed.
“The team and its ownership certainly don't want people to think of Gaza's Paralympic cycling team, Gaza Sunbirds, which is made up of amputees who've lost their limbs as a result of Israeli aggression.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour politicians slammed over visit to Israel-linked firm
Campaigners say the ICJ's recent ruling on the Israeli occupation makes clear that boycotts, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against Israeli occupation, colonisation, and apartheid are a moral imperative but also a legal obligation.
Earlier this year the IPT team removed any explicit mention of Israel from team vehicles as a “precautionary measure” but the team said it continues to “race proudly” as IPT with Israel branding on the racing kit.
In January, Froome appeared in a video posted on social media by Israel’s Foreign Ministry and the official state of Israel to promote a cycling event to support Gaza hostages. His involvement drew criticism, with some accusing him of sportswashing.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel