Scotland manager Steve Clarke has firmly refuted claims suggesting that striker Che Adams requested to be excused from the latest national team squad because he wanted extra time to settle into life in Italy.
The 28-year-old started all three games for Scotland at Euro 2024 this summer before joining Torino on a three-year-contract a few weeks later.
Adams, who has scored six times from 33 caps, was included in Clarke's initial pool of players for the upcoming UEFA Nations League clashes, where they will host Poland then face a trip to take on Portugal.
But the former Southampton talisman pulled out from the squad on Tuesday. Adams has featured in all four of Torino's domestic games this season which meant his Scotland absence was a surprise to many.
Clarke is now left with Lyndon Dykes, Tommy Conway, and Lawrence Shankland available as options for the centre-forward position.
"He's got an injury," Clarke stated as he was asked about Adams' situation. "The club informed us on Saturday morning that he'd picked up a knock in the game. The conversation with Che is then does he come across to be assessed and then sent back to Italy, there was no point so that's why he missed out."
Read more:
Speculation has been rife since Adams, Robby McCrorie, James Forrest and Greg Taylor withdrew from the squad earlier this week.
One outlet had even suggested that Adams' Scotland future had been cast in doubt.
However, Clarke has been quick to put such talk to bed.
"I can probably get you the email if you want," the Scotland gaffer said. "I've not got it on me this now but there was an official email came from Torino saying that he had injuries that he'd picked up in the games.
"His thigh and his knee, and they asked for him to be withdrawn from the squad.
"I've spoke to Che and the conversation was about to come across and be assessed or stay where you are, and we decided it was best that he stays where he is.
“By the same token, the two Celtic boys who played at the weekend came in on Sunday, got assessed by our medics and sent home because it’s easy, they’re in Glasgow. No big drama on that one.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here