Aryna Sabalenka was proud to be able to make her fairy-tale of New York come true as she earned US Open redemption by winning the women’s title.
The Belarusian suffered one of her darkest days when she lost last year’s final to Coco Gauff.
She threatened a repeat of that wobble in a nervy encounter, but this was her time, beating Jessica Pegula 7-5 7-5.
It is her second grand slam title of the year, following victory in Australia, and third in total as she proved herself to be the best hard-court player in the world, with few able to match her power in these conditions.
She said: “I am speechless right now. So many times I thought I was so close to getting the US Open title, it has always been a dream of mine and finally I have got this beautiful trophy, it means a lot.
“I remember all those tough losses in the past here. Never give up on your dream and keep trying and working hard.
“If you sacrifice everything for a dream you are going to get it one day. I am super proud of myself.”
Defeat broke the heart of Pegula, who dreamed of winning a maiden grand slam title in front of an American crowd in the New York state she was born.
She had strong support on Arthur Ashe but was unable to tame Sabalenka’s power despite serving for the second set.
Still, it was a fine tournament for the 30-year-old, whose tycoon father owns NFL side Buffalo Bills, and she continues to knock on the door on the biggest stage.
But it will take some time for her to appreciate that.
She said: “I’m just annoyed I lost right now. Everyone is like, ‘Congrats, amazing tournament’. I’m like, ‘Eh, whatever’.
“I think maybe once I decompress a little bit, I’m sure I will be a little bit more appreciative and see all of that.
“At some point. I should probably do that at some point.
“I think, for sure, I will take a lot of confidence from this in maybe like a hour or two, because like I said, I’m kind of annoyed.
“Not even annoyed losing the tournament. I think it’s more just I was looking at it at, like, I just wanted to win the match.
“Now there are things that are just in my head that I feel I should have done better and stuff like that. But like I said, I think that will pass in a little bit.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here