Ange Postecoglu has been involved in another spiky exchange with the media after Tottenham narrowly avoided being dumped out of the Carabao Cup by Coventry last night.
The former Celtic boss’s side were trailing 1-0 to the Championship club until the 88th minute, with late goals from Djed Spence and Brennan Johnson sparing Spurs’ blushes to send them through to the fourth round.
After the game, Postecoglu was questioned by the media about his substitution of midfielder Lucas Bergvall in the 62nd minute, with one journalist stating “the fans weren’t too happy” with the decision.
“I don’t make substitutions by poll, mate," Ange said, in another sharp response. "So you know, I’m sure the fans have got their own opinions but yeah, Lucas, like I said, that’s his first sort of significant game time for quite a while. What I didn’t want was pushing guys over the edge. I had some pretty good players on the bench who I thought could make an impact."
Read more:
It comes after the former Celtic manager was left baffled by the backlash he received to his statement that he "always wins" silverware in his second season, being branded rude by ex-Liverpool defender and pundit Stephen Warnock on Sky Sports.
When asked if he believed his side were the better team in the first 70 minutes of the Coventry game, the Australian bit back again: “No, I don’t think I’ve said that so far. If you need further clarification, I think I said ‘we hung in there’ so that suggests that we just dug deep to stay in the game. We didn’t dominate it.
“I don’t fall into the ‘lucky-unlucky’ because if we were lucky today it probably means we were unlucky in the other games and you know what, who cares, it doesn’t matter. It’s a game of football and we found a way to win tonight.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here