Leagues and unions will lodge a legal complaint with the European Commission on Monday accusing FIFA of abusing a dominant position over the fixture calendar.
The group, which includes the Premier League via its membership of the European Leagues collective, argue football’s global governing body did not properly consult over the new calendar before it was announced in March last year, and that as a result the schedule has gone “beyond saturation”.
The introduction of a 32-team Club World Cup every four years has been seen as the tipping point, but the bigger issue, they say, is FIFA’s general conduct around this issue, alleging it has favoured its own commercial interests which has in turn “harmed the economic interests of national leagues and the welfare of players”.
League sources point to Manchester City’s recent request to postpone domestic matches at the start of next season in order to allow more recovery time after the Club World Cup as a prime example of how this new competition will impact on the schedule and quality of their own.
The Premier League can point to the fact that it has been a 20-team competition for almost 30 years, and that fixture congestion in the club game is the result of expansion at the international level by UEFA and now FIFA.
FIFA insists the calendar announced at its 2023 Congress in Rwanda was the result of extensive consultation, and that it is fully within its rights to set the parameters of its own competitions like the Club World Cup provided they fit within the agreed calendar framework.
The leagues have also been accused of “hypocrisy” by FIFA, which says these leagues “prefer a calendar filled with friendlies and summer tours” such as the Premier League’s own Summer Series.
Read more:
- Ronaldo's continued international impact shows age is just a number
- FIFA urged to act as Celtic and Rangers go from 'hunters to hunted'
FIFPRO Europe, the continental arm of the world players’ union FIFPRO, is also part of the action.
There have already been a number of instances of players speaking out about the demands of the calendar, with Manchester City midfielder Rodri saying players were “close” to striking over the issue, shortly before he suffered a season-ending injury.
UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin, who has overseen the expansion of European club competitions, said on Thursday that the calendar had “reached its limit” but added to the BBC: “Who is complaining? Those who earn the highest salaries and those teams with a squad of 25 top-level players.
“Those with lower salaries and hardly 11 players do not complain. They love to play.”
The submission of the legal complaint marks the third consecutive week where a competition law case has made the football headlines.
On October 4 the European Court of Justice found some of FIFA’s transfer rules breached competition and freedom of movement law in the case of former Arsenal, Chelsea and Portsmouth midfielder Lassana Diarra.
Earlier this week the Premier League’s associated party transaction (APT) rules were found to be unlawful after a challenge by Manchester City.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here