Celtic impressed with a hard-fought 0-0 draw against Atalanta in Italy last night (Wednesday), with a brave display that better reflected the standards Brendan Rodgers seeks in Europe.
With the Parkhead side now sitting 20th out of 36 in the new-format UEFA Champions League with five games remaining, the football on display wasn't the only familiar sight on a foreign pitch – the sponsor on the front of the Celtic shirt was once again The Celtic FC Foundation.
As has become the norm away from home in European competition over the last several years, the club's default sponsor – betting agency Dafabet – was dropped in favour of the club's charitable arm. But why is this the case?
Simply, betting sponsors are banned in certain countries – including Italy, where Celtic played last night.
With the ban having been introduced in 2019, the yellow and green away kit Celtic wore when overcoming Lazio in the UEFA Europa League that same year was given the same treatment.
With the same ban introduced in Spain in 2021, Celtic adopted the same strategy against Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid on recent trips.
England is set to roll out the same ban in 2026, however Scotland as yet has no such plans.
Read more:
- These inventive Celtic third kit concepts are spectacular
- As Adidas goes retro, this Celtic third kit concept ticks every box
Similar bans apply in other European countries in relation to alcohol brand sponsors, which once saw Celtic's previous sponsor, Tennent's Lager, switched out for Tipperary Mineral Water.
Both owned by Irish multinational company C&C Group, the Hoops swapped from Tennent's to Tipperary in 2013, which looked like this:
Having swapped to The Celtic Foundation away from home in Europe in recent years by mandate, Celtic appear to have adopted the switch on a universal basis, regardless of the country travelled to.
A well deserved point with the Bhoys sporting the Foundation crest on their jerseys in Italy! 👏👕
— Celtic FC Foundation (@FoundationCFC) October 23, 2024
Huge thanks again to @Dafabet for their continued support of the Foundation 💚 pic.twitter.com/FK3PHUHALJ
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel