BRENDAN Rodgers tonight stressed that his focus remains firmly on Celtic after the Parkhead club forged nine points clear of their city rivals Rangers at the top of the William Hill Premiership.
The Scottish champions increased their slender goal difference advantage over Aberdeen at the top of the league table with a hard-fought 2-0 triumph over Dundee at Parkhead.
But with the Ibrox club crashing to a 2-1 loss up at Pittodrie, they are now trhee further in front of the team who have been their nearest challengers during the past three seasons.
Rodgers, who revealed he is confident of Adam Idah, Nicolas Kuhn and Callum McGregor all being available for the Premier Sports Cup semi-final against Aberdeen at Hampden on Saturday, is unconcerned about the position of Philippe Clement’s men.
Asked if he was surprised that Celtic are so far in front of Rangers after 10 games, he said: “Listen, Aberdeen have had a fantastic start. That's a really good result for them. But as I'm sure you can respect, my focus is very much on Celtic.
“Our guys have made a brilliant start also, in terms of how they've been playing and the goals they've been scoring. They are secure defensively in the main and in a really good position in the Champions League.
“But it's still so early. My first marker is after 10 games. And if I look at it after 10 games, then we've made a really good start. Aberdeen are there as well, but there's still such a long way to go.”
Rodgers made six changes to the Celtic side which beat Motherwell 3-0 at Fir Park on Sunday and it took until the second half for his new-look team to wear down Dundee’s stubborn resistance.
But an Alistair Johnston goal and an Arne Engels penalty secured another three points.
“I was pleased,” said the manager. “Obviously, we made changes in the game. It's one of those ones where you can be more comfortable in the game if you get those early goals with two massive chances in that first period of the game.
“And of course, if you can get those against a team that's going to be resolute and defend, then that can open up the game for you. So we didn't quite take the chances. We had other big chances in the game, but I have to be pleased.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel