Manchester United have confirmed that Ruud van Nistelrooy has departed the club after serving as interim manager in recent weeks.
The Dutchman stepped into the role temporarily following the dismissal of Erik ten Hag on October 28.
Van Nistelrooy, who returned to Old Trafford as an assistant coach in July under a two-year contract, achieved three wins and one draw in his four matches as caretaker boss, with the team scoring 11 goals during that period and keeping two clean sheets.
Despite these positive results, incoming manager Ruben Amorim, who is still waiting for a visa before he can officially begin coaching, has opted not to retain Van Nistelrooy's services.
The 48-year-old is a former Netherlands international striker and enjoyed a successful five-season playing career at Manchester United in the early 2000's.
He was previously head coach at PSV Eindhoven after being appointed in March 2022, and went on to win the Johan Cruyff Shield and the 2022-23 KNVB Cup before sensationally resigning, citing "a lack of support".
Read more:
- Ben Doak 'really enjoying' football as he reflects on loan experience
- Green Brigade release Celtic protest statement on ‘hypocrisy & shame’
A club statement on Monday afternoon read: "Manchester United can confirm that Ruud van Nistelrooy has left the club. Ruud rejoined in the summer and has taken charge of the team for the past four matches as interim head coach.
"We are grateful for his contribution and the way in which he has approached his role throughout his time with the club. He will always be very welcome at Old Trafford.
"Rene Hake, Jelle ten Rouwelaar and Pieter Morel have also departed and we wish them all well for the future.
"We will confirm the full men’s first team coaching composition in due course."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here