Former Celtic manager Martin O Neill has outlined his position on the Green Brigade's disruption of the minute's silence at Rugby Park last Sunday.
The legendary former boss also backed Irish winger James McLean, who protests all such displays in England by standing apart from his teammates.
O'Neill has taken a nuanced stance on the situation, pointing out that Celtic fans should have remained silent rather than singing throughout - but explaining why the roots of their actions can be explained by history.
Asked if the fans should have remained quiet, he told TALKsport: "Yes, they should. If it's a minute's silence, it's a minute's silence.
He added: "You should have respect for the moment… yes, just being silent. And I would go with that. But in terms of the wearing of the poppy, in terms of all of those particular things during it, there is that historical point.
“Derek McInnes might have a point because I think there is an idea of having respect for a moment, and because it’s Kilmarnock’s home game.
“But this is historical. We've gone through this here before.. for a lot of Irish republicans and nationalists, the poppy does represent a bit of oppression.
“Way back, just after the First World War; in terms of the British Army; a group called the Black and Tans coming in and just running amok - these type of things have happened.
Read more:
“And so that is historical, and that has had an effect.
“Young James McClean has taken a stance there, because of where he lives, and where he was brought up, and that's completely understandable.
“James took the stance some years ago, realising that he was putting his career in jeopardy in the sense that he not only was going to be booed by away fans, but he was going to be booed by his home fans at Sunderland.
“And he went from, you know, from being a hero, where he did brilliantly, absolutely brilliantly, in his first season there to being booed at home. That's very, very difficult to take, but he took that stance.
“I commend James for it. He's a brave lad. He's not only brave on the pitch, he's brave off the pitch as well.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel