Rangers legend Barry Ferguson thinks they made the right decision to part ways with Connor Goldson this summer - despite the player claiming that he still had a lot to offer.
The ex-Rangers vice-captain, 31, left for Aris Limassol in July after being forced to depart the club against his will.
During a recent interview, Goldson, who played over 300 times across a six-year period, mentioned the fact that Rangers never built on their Scottish Premiership success in 2021, and was critical of life beyond Steven Gerrard's Ibrox tenure - stating the Light Blues "have never been the same since".
Discussing Goldson's comments on the Go Radio Football Show, the former Rangers skipper said: "I don't like hearing that. I thought Gio [Van Bronckhorst] done a fine job. Rangers were maybe too quick in getting rid of Gio if I'm being honest.
"Steven Gerrard obviously brought the title back to the club, then moved on to Aston Villa and Gio come in and Gio had a style of play. I thought Gio done a fine job. He just had a few iffy results towards the end of his time at Rangers.
Read more:
-
Goldson reveals mysterious 'new' Rangers figure who wanted him OUT
-
Barisic struggles in Turkey: Agent negotiates contract termination
"At that time, Connor had signed a new contract, but personally, I thought it was the right time for Connor to go. I thought that he was a really good player for Rangers but it was time for him to move on.
"What I will say is that for the previous six years, he was one guy that did put his body on the line. I will give him that. I'm sure at times he says he could've played better but every time Connor Goldson gave you 100 per cent.
"When it came to the summer and he left, I just thought it was the right move for both Rangers and Connor."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel