Lorient goalkeeper Yvon Mvogo has admitted he was "very sad" not to seal a transfer switch in the summer with Celtic an interested club.
The Swiss international has revealed he had a plethora of options on the table but potential fees or limited game-time assurances scuppered transfer dealings.
Celtic were credited with an interest in Mvogo in the summer before landing Kasper Schmeichel.
Quizzed on failed moves to Celtic, Parma and Augsburg Mvogo told Blick: "I'll be honest, I was very sad about how things went. It wasn't an easy time.
"I wanted to leave Lorient after relegation so that I could continue to compete and prove myself at the highest possible level. I knew that it could be problematic if I played in the second division.
"Yes, there were a lot of offers. They all came relatively early.
Read more:
"At that point I wanted to take my time with the decision. I couldn't have imagined how difficult the market would be during the summer.
"Many clubs wanted free goalkeepers or ones that could be loaned out. But I had a contract with Lorient, which meant a transfer fee would have been due."
Mvogo also had interest from Premier League giants Manchester United in the summer with Erik ten Hag thought to be interested in the goalkeeper as a back-up option.
The Swiss international, though, was not keen on a move to become a No2 at any club.
"Correct, Manchester United for example. But that wasn't an option for me," he said.
"I'm not happy if I can't be on the pitch. I want to enjoy my time on the pitch right now, together with fans and teammates. I want to play for titles and ideally win them too."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here