Liverpool head coach Arne Slot admits even he was surprised by Darwin Nunez’s brilliant goal which capped a 3-0 victory over Bournemouth.
Leading by two Luis Diaz goals in as many first-half minutes, the Reds striker, on his first start since April, produced a reminder of his talent with a curling effort around Kepa Arrizabalaga that went in off the far post.
Slot was certainly not expecting the check-back and shot, especially with Mohamed Salah and Diaz in support at the time, but accepted the outcome justified the individuality.
“My first instinct was ‘Why does he shoot?’. He made the ball free and the defender was on the ground but a fraction of a second later the ball goes in off the post,” said the Dutchman.
“Maybe he is a better player than I was in the past.”
Nunez looked emotional, appearing to wipe tears from his eyes with his shirt, after scoring his first club goal in 15 appearances, most as a substitute after previous boss Jurgen Klopp appeared to finally lose patience with him towards the end of last season.
The Uruguay international has been something of a streaky player with an eye for the spectacular but Slot wants him to have greater consistency to be able to offer more to the team.
“I think with consistency you get by two things: work rate and team performance,” he added.
“If the team performance is not so good it is harder for the individual to be consistent as well.
“We have to work on the training ground and that is what we try to do every day and he showed today a good game.
“Maybe he can show it again on Wednesday (in the Carabao Cup against West Ham) but we have to see.”
Bournemouth boss Andoni Iraola admitted Liverpool’s superior cutting edge was the difference.
“The stats were quite level but they were better when it mattered,” he said.
“When the game is on the line. They were much better than us. When they had the chances they made the difference.
“They are very dangerous, they have a lot of speed, especially up front with Darwin, Luis Diaz and Mohamed Salah, they have a threat in behind.
“You look at the stats and I think we had 20 shots and seven corners. We had momentum but it had less value.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here