Manchester United’s proposed regeneration of Trafford Park could boost the UK economy by up to £7.3billion, according to global advisory firm Oxford Economics.
United unveiled further details about the project, which is centred on a new 100,000-capacity stadium, at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool on Monday.
Oxford Economics, who were commissioned by the club to investigate the economic feasibility of the project, outlined what they believe will be its enormous impact.
The firm found the project, which is being spearheaded by billionaire Ineos chief Sir Jim Ratcliffe, could also deliver 92,000 new jobs, more than 17,000 new homes and an extra 1.8million visitors per year.
Since buying a minority stake in the club in February, which effectively put him in charge at Old Trafford, Ratcliffe has spoken of his desire to create a “Wembley of the North” upon the footprint of the club’s existing home.
Although Ratcliffe initially hinted he could pursue government assistance in order to fund the project, the prospect of using public money appeared to be ruled out by Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham.
Burnham told ITV: “It could be the catalyst for growth across the North West.
“This scheme could also bring benefits to the Liverpool City Region. They have plans for a major strategic rail interchange just off the M6 in St Helens. If we relocate the freight behind the current Old Trafford, that will help that scheme go forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here