Jeremy Doku insists there is no pressure on Manchester City’s forwards to score more to mask the absence of midfield lynchpin Rodri.
The champions need to find a way to cope without the influential Spaniard after he was ruled out for the rest of the season with a serious knee injury last month.
Mateo Kovacic proved himself a more-than-adequate replacement on Saturday with two goals as City came from behind to beat Fulham 3-2 in a tough Premier League encounter at the Etihad Stadium.
It was a game in which City had 20 shots – with Doku himself scoring a stunner – and the Belgian says the approach was no different than usual.
He said: “Every time we try to score more goals. It’s not because Rodri’s not there that we try to score more.
“If we can score even more we will always try with or without Rodri.
“He’s a one-of-a-kind player, but Kova played in his position and did well. He scored two nice goals. He’s a good guy, deserves what he got.”
City dominated the early stages and were stunned when Andreas Pereira fired Fulham into a 26th-minute lead after a clever backheel flick by Raul Jimenez.
Yet the Cottagers had already served a warning when Adama Traore missed a gilt-edged chance and the same player squandered several more in a frustrating afternoon.
They were made to pay for the those misses as Kovacic turned the game around with his double and Doku sealed the points with a fine strike in the 82nd minute before a late Rodrigo Muniz consolation.
“I saw there was a lot of space on the inside and just tried to hit the ball well,” said Doku, who cut inside from the left to fire home from distance after coming off the bench.
“As soon as I lifted my head up it went in. I like ‘dribble’ goals, for example against Luton, but of course this is one of the most beautiful.”
Fulham’s defeat was their first since their 1-0 loss across town at Manchester United in their opening game of the season.
Despite the result, Pereira felt the Cottagers could take plenty from their performance.
“It’s mixed feelings,” he said. “We created a few chances and I would say a draw would be fair. We’re very proud of what we did.
“It is a difficult place to play and we played well. They have a lot of quality players and we showed we can compete against them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here