Wakefield Trinity owner Matt Ellis hailed his club’s “great achievement” after their return to the Betfred Super League was confirmed following the release of IMG’s first official gradings.
The Belle Vue club crushed Toulouse 36-0 to clinch the Championship Grand Final last weekend but still had to wait to confirm their ascent to the top flight at the first attempt due to new criteria used to determine the structure of the 2025 competition.
Having opened a new 2,500 capacity stand and made other significant off-field advances since Ellis took charge a year ago, Wakefield – who were one of nine clubs granted an ‘A’ grade – are guaranteed immunity from relegation provided their current standards are maintained.
Ellis said: “It’s a great achievement by everybody at the club. We’ve bounced back and the score we’ve received is the icing on the cake.
“It’s been an absolutely fantastic few weeks for the club with the awards at Leeds, the Grand Final and now we’ve cleared this final hurdle and we’re back in Super League.”
Wakefield scored 15.09, nudging over the upper threshold courtesy of the 0.25 performance points they earned for beating their French rivals.
St Helens topped the standings with a score of 17.02 out of a possible 20, with Wigan second in the rankings on 16.91, and Leeds third on 16.84.
Hull KR, Warrington and Catalans Dragons retained the ‘A’ grades they were provisionally awarded in the indicative gradings at the start of the season, while Leigh and Castleford both joined Wakefield in moving into the top bracket.
Despite losing their ‘A’ status after a dismal year on the field, Hull FC did enough to retain their top-flight status along with Huddersfield and Salford. who scored 13.97, edging out Toulouse by just under half a point.
The announcement has largely avoided controversy due to Trinity replacing the Super League’s bottom club London. However there is hope for the Broncos, who are currently seeking a new backer, who saw one of the biggest jumps from 24th in the indicative gradings to 14th with a score of 12.65.
RL Commercial chief executive Rhodri Jones admitted the results would expedite discussions about a potential increase in the size of the top flight from 12 to 14 teams in the near future.
Leading clubs are understood to be resistant to the notion of further divisions in the current revenue pot, but Jones said: “I think based on there being nine grade A clubs, that conversation starts sooner than we expected.
“There is a chance we will end up with 12 grade A clubs next year, and there is a broader conversation to be had around 14 teams, which could potentially happen by 2026.
“It’s not a new conversation, it’s something that has been ongoing for five years, but it is a conversation that says once we get to 12 grade As we will review the competition structure.”
The introduction of the gradings system, rubber-stamped by a large majority of clubs last April, axed automatic promotion and relegation in favour of a points-based system determined by scores across five ‘pillars’ – fandom, on-field performance, finance, stadium and community.
Keighley, the most vociferous critics of the grading system, and one of the few to vote against it, proved to be the biggest beneficiaries, rising 11 places to 19th and a Grade B score of 9.02.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here