Harry Brook was finally dismissed for 171 as England motored ahead of New Zealand on the third morning of the first Test in Christchurch.
England smashed 140 in the opening session to open up a lead of 111, reaching lunch at 459 for eight.
Ben Stokes was 78 not out at the break, progressing steadily towards a first hundred in almost 18 months, and Gus Atkinson chipped in a rapid 48.
Brook was dropped four times on his way to a century on day two and continued his personal game of ‘catch me if you can’ when he was put down yet again by Glenn Phillips on Saturday morning.
After being spared on 18, 41, 70, 106 and now 147, his luck eventually ran out when wicketkeeper Tom Blundell held on to an edge off Matt Henry.
But that was cold comfort for the Black Caps, who had already seen the Yorkshireman add five fours and a six to his overnight score of 132.
Tim Southee, who has announced his retirement at the end of series, was treated with particular disdain by Brook, whose average ticked just about 60 as he walked off the field at Hagley Oval.
As it stands that leaves him second among all England batters, a shade behind the great Herbert Sutcliffe.
England had resumed 29 behind on 319 for five, with Brook and Stokes showed an eagerness to wipe away that deficit. After chuckling to himself when Phillips fumbled the chance at slip, Brook took England into the lead and brought up his fourth score of 150 or more with two fours off Southee.
Once he departed Chris Woakes followed close behind but Atkinson took up the role of aggressor as Stokes got his head down. Atkinson brought up the 400 with a thumping pull off Henry and he soon showed off an admirable range for a number nine – pumping a lofted cover drive and a classy square cut to the ropes.
He top-edged a pull for six when Nathan Smith went short, then stepped back and crashed him through extra cover. His ambition got the better of him when he lifted the seamer to deep midwicket but his 36-ball cameo had been destructive.
Stokes was playing a steadier role, adding 40 in the two-hour session, but a ton in the city of his birth was beckoning.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here