WHEN looking for anti-German jingoism on social media, I didn’t have to search very far to find it.
To be fair, a wee bit of jingoism is unavoidable when it comes to major international competitions. Mostly, it really is just harmless fun. But there was an ugly side to a lot of social media content last night. Much of it related to World War Two, which is rarely a laughing matter (Dad’s Army aside).
I was struck this morning by a tweet from historian Ewan Gibbs, saying that it was a generation after the end of WW2 before “two world wars and one world cup” style revanchism took off, and that it has deepened ever since.
Seen a lot about Britain/England ‘not getting over’ the Second World War but I think that’s a misunderstanding of the historical dynamics. It was a generation after the end of the war that ‘two world wars one world cup’ revanchism took off, and it has deepened since.
— Ewan Gibbs 🇺🇦 (@ewangibbs) June 30, 2021
I think this is very true. Crude triumphalism has almost become the norm across sections of the British media. But we all have our own “war stories” as part of our family lore, and they usually tell a very different tale about those who lived through it.
Neither of my two grandfathers fought. On my dad’s side of the family, my grandpa was too old. But granny was a fluent French speaker and held open house for the Free French in Glasgow. And they gave away their children to keep them safe – dad and his two brothers being evacuated for most of the duration of the conflict. How difficult that must have been, with communication almost exclusively by letter. But around three and a half million children were separated from their families during this period.
READ MORE: UK Government building in Wales to get eight-storey tall Union flag
Others in the family did see service, including my dad’s Uncle Bert. He was a medic and one of the first to arrive at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp when it was liberated. That experience stayed with him for the rest of his life.
On mum’s side of the family, my granda worked on trains as a fireman. This was a reserved occupation and a dangerous one. He didn’t often talk about it, but sometimes recounted a story about going hell for leather to reach a tunnel when they were being bombed, without being able to be completely sure there wasn’t already another train waiting there!
For those of us born on mainland Britain after WW2, the various wars the UK has engaged in have been fought over there – wherever “there” happened to be. But WW2 was fought at home, as well as overseas.
I recall a woman in London I knew as a child. As a teenager, she lost most of her family during the early days of the Blitz. She was spared because she worked in a munitions factory overnight. One morning she came home to find her street bombed to the ground. She told me how she initially thought the people she saw walking around were ghosts, until she looked down at herself and realised that she was also covered in dust from the rubble. That’s why everyone looked grey.
The older I get, the greater my admiration for these people grows. Over the past year we have, to a lesser extent obviously, lived through a national crisis. Perhaps that experience gives us a deeper insight into the scale of their courage and endurance.
READ MORE: Jeremy Vine claims Brexit gave 'whole of UK self-confidence' to succeed at Euros
But I worry that, as events become more distant over time, their memory might come to be represented by the kind of coarse xenophobia that has become common. That would be a travesty because, in my experience anyway, the people who lived through the war weren’t like that at all.
When I think of my grandparents’ generation, it brings to mind a kind of determined, low key cheerfulness that seemed to characterise them. You can see this stoicism portrayed in some of the war films of the period. It never really left them.
There was no triumphalism about them. They were rightly proud of beating Hitler but not boastful. Rather, they were determined to make the best of things now. Having gone through hell, they wanted to build back better, to use the current phrase.
These were the folk who gave us the NHS and the Welfare State after all. More than anything else, I think they wanted to create a better world for their children and grandchildren. They didn’t want us to endure what they had endured.
Rather than bombastic jingoism, that is their true legacy to their descendants. It’s a very fine one, and it’s how we should remember and honour them.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel