Frank Lampard has branded Giovani Lo Celso avoiding a red card as “another huge question mark” on the Video Assistant Referee system.
Tottenham midfielder Lo Celso stamped on Chelsea captain Cesar Azpilicueta as the Blues beat Spurs 2-1 in Saturday’s Premier League clash at Stamford Bridge.
Referee Michael Oliver missed the incident and a VAR review ruled against a red card for Lo Celso – but technology coordinators at Stockley Park later admitted their error and that the Spurs star should have been dismissed.
Olivier Giroud and Marcos Alonso struck as Chelsea cemented fourth place, but Blues manager Lampard was left fuming at Lo Celso avoiding a dismissal.
“Everybody knew they made a mistake,” said Lampard.
“We have got the monitor on the side of the pitch and can view it.
“I was just waiting for the red card to be shown, not with pleasure, but that’s a tackle that endangers a player.
“It’s just not good enough, there’s no more to say. Saying afterwards they made a mistake is not good enough. They had minutes, but they still made a mistake.
Wow! Lo Celso escapes without any punishment. #THFC #COYS
— Jonathan Veal (@jonathandveal83) February 22, 2020
“It’s another huge question mark on VAR.
“I want it to be good, I want it to work. VAR was brought in to remove mistakes and it was so wrong today. So it’s more question marks.
“This situation didn’t need the pitchside monitor. It’s a clear decision, Stockley Park, red card, game goes on.”
Smart strikes from Giroud and Alonso ensured Chelsea wound up avoiding losing out to VAR again, while Antonio Rudiger was unlucky to put through his own net late on.
Manchester United captain Harry Maguire somehow avoided a red card as Chelsea lost out 2-0 at Stamford Bridge on Monday night.
The Blues also saw two goals chalked off by VAR against the Red Devils and to add insult to injury, it was Maguire who headed home the clinching goal for United.
Chelsea’s victory over Spurs at Stamford Bridge on Saturday proved the first time the officials had admitted a mistake in a VAR ruling.
And that left Tottenham manager Jose Mourinho frustrated with what he considered an unwanted precedent, calling on officials to be consistent with handling mistakes.
Mourinho continued to lament Liverpool’s Andy Robertson escaping punishment for fouling Japhet Tanganga in the Reds’ 1-0 win at Spurs on January 11, and Etienne Capoue avoiding any sanction in Tottenham’s goalless draw at Watford a week later.
“I hope the noise is the same noise as when the VAR kills us,” said Mourinho.
“I hope the noise is exactly the same; against Liverpool when Robertson should get a red card and didn’t. Against Watford when Capoue should get a red card, with the same gentleman here, Michael Oliver.
“Why didn’t they say that when they made a mistake against Liverpool and Watford? That’s what I mean by the same noise.”
Spurs boss Mourinho claimed an inside source had leaked him Chelsea’s plans to switch to three centre-backs and wing-backs ahead of Saturday’s derby clash.
Lampard admitted he fully believed a source had passed on the information, but he was phlegmatic about the realities of modern football.
“That’s the world we live in; I’m not being sinister about it, but that’s the world we live in,” said Lampard.
“I’m not that trusting in all ways in everybody. That’s life.”
Mourinho meanwhile insisted after his side’s loss that he had only guessed at Chelsea’s tactical switch, and had not in fact been leaked any inside information.
Asked about his predictions, Mourinho said: “I guessed; because there is a logic, there is a logic on it.
“When they have a run of bad results they go to five (in defence). That’s something obvious.
“So nobody leaked me anything. They are loyal to him (Lampard).”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here