HSBC has appointed headhunters to find new non-executive directors in an effort to freshen up its board.
Europe’s biggest bank has previously said its next chairman will be an external candidate, and it has also been reported that one of the new non-executives was likely to be a replacement for Chairman Douglas Flint.
Shareholders and industry sources have previously said they expected Flint to step down in the next 12 to 24 months.
The bank has appointed headhunters MWM Consulting to search for new non-executive directors, a source said.
HSBC has been shaken by a scandal over failings at its Swiss private bank after allegations it helped clients to dodge taxes.
Flint, 59, has been chairman since 2010, and before that hadbeen finance director since 1995. He is respected for his regulatory expertiseand he also chairs industry lobby group the Institute of International Finance.
Several investors said the time was right for HSBC to planfor a change.“Douglas Flint has been a good company man, but due to (thelength of) his tenure, a lot of things have gone wrong while he has beenthere,” one of the bank’s 20 largest shareholders said.
Flint was appointed chairman and Stuart Gulliver was namedchief executive after a boardroom battle in 2010, which marked a departure fromHSBC’s track record of orderly successions.
After that, the bank said it had told shareholders the boardwould ensure it had non-executives eligible to move up to be the next chairman andone of them probably would.
HSBC’s longest serving non-executives who could be replaced include Rona Fairhead and Simon Robertson, who have been on the board for 11years and nine years respectively. Sam Laidlaw, Rachel Lomax and Safra Catz,also non-executives, have been on the board since 2008.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here